What is your risk tolerance?

Brian Fischer

Brian Fischer, CFA, CFP® Financial Analyst

When I think of risk and the markets, I’m reminded of one my favorite Mark Twain quotes:October: This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks. The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August and February.” Although I can’t help but laugh, I don’t doubt that some people feel this way about investing. It’s easy to think of the market as highly speculative when recalling the turmoil of the dotcom bubble in 2001 or the subprime housing crisis of 2007-2009. Pile on the around-the-clock media coverage of the market’s every move that at times stokes feelings of apprehension, and suddenly the thought of risk and investing can be frightening. Fear of risk even seems reasonable. On the contrary, it’s very dangerous. Unhealthy attitudes and beliefs about risk can prevent you from investing in a manner needed to achieve your goals. Stated differently, a proper understanding of risk and, more importantly, knowing your risk tolerance is essential to creating a viable financial plan.

What is Risk Tolerance?

To understand risk tolerance, we first need to distinguish it from risk capacity. Risk tolerance can be thought of as your willingness to take risk. It comprises your attitudes and beliefs. Risk capacity, on the other hand, is the ability to take risk or withstand losses. It is your resources relative to your goals.

… tolerance relates to an individual’s emotional limit of acceptable risk; capacity refers to the financial capacity to withstand market losses. These two factors are not necessarily correlated. For example, it is not uncommon to find an investor with significant assets and modest demands on those assets such that a significant market loss would not affect the ability to maintain the individual’s desired quality of life. (i.e., high risk capacity). However, that same investor might be unwilling to invest any significant portion of the portfolio in stock and might well bail out of whatever stock allocation there was in a significant bear market (i.e., low risk tolerance). As a consequence, questions regarding capacity are more important for general planning purposes but are not relevant for evaluating tolerance.1

When markets are doing well, risk is irrelevant and risk tolerance is infinite. It’s only when the market is falling that risk becomes important. Investors too often make the mistake of panicking in a bear market and selling their investments at depressed prices. They effectively buy high and sell low, and lock in losses that can be irreversibly detrimental to their financial plan. For that reason, we believe the most practical definition of risk tolerance to be the moment right before you call us and say, “I can’t stand it anymore; sell me out.”

How do we evaluate risk tolerance?

While we use a well-known and widely-used traditional risk survey, FinaMetrica, most of our evaluation is done through our conversations with you and our Risk Tolerance Questionnaire (RTQ). Although the RTQ is a formal questionnaire that can be completed individually, we work through it with our clients and use it as an educational tool to facilitate discussion about how each of us thinks about risk and investing.

Our entire process is grounded in the idea that each of our clients has a unique perspective about risk. To understand these perspectives, we use the insights into behavioral finance to provide explanations for why people make the decisions that they do.

People are strange. There is no more apparent example than the psychology of risk. People in general and clients in particular have difficulty distinguishing between knowledge-based risk and foolhardy speculation. As an example, investors grossly overestimate their knowledge and, even when provided with good data, they are poor mathematicians of probability.

Investors also have difficulty estimating the risk of future events. They are much more comfortable with short-term events in which they have more intuitive confidence in their knowledge. This results in a tendency to overstate their personal risk-taking propensity.2

Behavioral finance recognizes that we have limitations in processing large amounts of information, thus impacting our decision making. To overcome these limitations, we use heuristics to simplify decisions. Heuristics are mental shortcuts, also known as rules of thumb, based on our experiences. They are helpful in making quick and adequate decisions, but can also lead to biases that result in harmful decisions when used inappropriately.

By understanding the nature of heuristics, [we are] able to better understand the underlying issues influencing a client’s risk tolerance. Also, [we are] more effective in assisting [our clients} to modify misleading heuristics, as well as becoming a better educator and guide [for] our clients in the useful application of these mental shortcuts.3

A common heuristic that creates a harmful perspective about risk is the availability bias. This mental shortcut uses recent and easily recalled information to draw conclusions. A classic example of this bias is described at the beginning of this essay with an individual who is fearful of risk because he or she easily recalls bear markets and is engulfed in the around-the-clock media coverage of market volatility. By addressing this bias and any others that may be harmful, we help our clients form reasonable perceptions of risk. Finally, with a common understanding of risk we can then properly evaluate risk tolerance and invest in a manner to which our clients are most likely to remain committed.

Identifying and working through the flaws in emotional thinking helps us avoid common traps that create harmful or unrealistic expectations that hinder us from achieving our goals.

Feel free to contact Brian Fischer with any questions by phone 305.448.8882 ext.235 or email: BFischer@EK-FF.com

  1. Evensky, Harold, Stephen M. Horan, and Thomas R. Robinson. The New Wealth Management: The Financial Advisor’s Guide to Managing and Investing Client Assets. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley, 2011. 57.
  2. Evensky, Harold, Stephen M. Horan, and Thomas R. Robinson. The New Wealth Management: The Financial Advisor’s Guide to Managing and Investing Client Assets. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley, 2011. 59.
  3. Evensky, Harold, Stephen M. Horan, and Thomas R. Robinson. The New Wealth Management: The Financial Advisor’s Guide to Managing and Investing Client Assets. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley, 2011. 59.